Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
How bad is bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gih" data-source="post: 291134" data-attributes="member: 18541"><p>Hi there!</p><p> </p><p>First time poster with a technical question.</p><p> </p><p>If a scope does not hold zero (lost 5" of elevation without any known cause - no drops - non-magnum rifle), and then comes up 6" when it is only adjusted to come up 5", then can I basically write off all results from this scope? I feel like I can not differentiate shooter error from the potentially random effects of my optics. I can say that I shoot much better with what should be an inferior rifle, and have been struggling to tighten up groups on this new gun.</p><p> </p><p>Thanks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gih, post: 291134, member: 18541"] Hi there! First time poster with a technical question. If a scope does not hold zero (lost 5" of elevation without any known cause - no drops - non-magnum rifle), and then comes up 6" when it is only adjusted to come up 5", then can I basically write off all results from this scope? I feel like I can not differentiate shooter error from the potentially random effects of my optics. I can say that I shoot much better with what should be an inferior rifle, and have been struggling to tighten up groups on this new gun. Thanks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
How bad is bad?
Top