Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hornady A Tip
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="crazyhorse" data-source="post: 1693604" data-attributes="member: 3056"><p>The 175 ELD-X (7mm) was absolutely awful (2-3 moa @ 100yds) in my rifle as well as another with every load we tried, and the 162 would barely hold 1moa. I've was always a fan of the Amax because of tried and true great results but something changed when they switched to the ELD line. Biggest difference I can find is consistency, the ELD's seem to be fairly inconsistent in weight as well as base to ogive measurements.</p><p>Both of the rifles I tried them in are proven shooters, giving around 1/2 moa consistently with Amax and Accubonds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="crazyhorse, post: 1693604, member: 3056"] The 175 ELD-X (7mm) was absolutely awful (2-3 moa @ 100yds) in my rifle as well as another with every load we tried, and the 162 would barely hold 1moa. I've was always a fan of the Amax because of tried and true great results but something changed when they switched to the ELD line. Biggest difference I can find is consistency, the ELD's seem to be fairly inconsistent in weight as well as base to ogive measurements. Both of the rifles I tried them in are proven shooters, giving around 1/2 moa consistently with Amax and Accubonds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hornady A Tip
Top