Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
hodgdon 4350 vs imr4895 in 30-06
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2371725" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>I know he talking about IMR 4895 at 46gn. I posted the QL to support what I said, it's probably 50fps slow for barrel length, so to accout for that here's the Hodgdon data also - 24" barrel, and he's three grains below minimum:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]321341[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Nosler data is conservative, but does list 57.5gn as max for 165gn/ H4350. Hodgon goes up to 59gn max. H4350 wouldn't be pressuring out, you'd be limited by how much you can compress at a given COL. Hodgdon data uses a longer COL than Nosler.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2371725, member: 116181"] I know he talking about IMR 4895 at 46gn. I posted the QL to support what I said, it's probably 50fps slow for barrel length, so to accout for that here's the Hodgdon data also - 24" barrel, and he's three grains below minimum: [ATTACH type="full" alt="IMR 4895.JPG"]321341[/ATTACH] Nosler data is conservative, but does list 57.5gn as max for 165gn/ H4350. Hodgon goes up to 59gn max. H4350 wouldn't be pressuring out, you'd be limited by how much you can compress at a given COL. Hodgdon data uses a longer COL than Nosler. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
hodgdon 4350 vs imr4895 in 30-06
Top