Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hexagonal Boron Nitride
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 1075494" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>Chronographed some HBN coated bullets, fired from HBN coated bores, in two different rifles. I have extensive chronograph MV data from both rifles from the prior 7 years firing the identical uncoated bullets. The MV of the first bullet fired from each freshly HBN-coated bore was NOT recorded. MVs were recorded over a set of triplicate chronographs, meaning three MVs were simultaneously recorded for each bullet fired using three separate chronographs. Chronograph agreement was excellent. Confidence in these MVs is high. My current disclaimer is that I only fired one bullet at each powder charge as this was my initial testing of HBN-coated bullet MV. But I expect this data to be reinforced with additional chronograph sessions, because my findings are similar to what others have reported.</p><p></p><p><u><strong>7mm Rem Mag</strong>, 168gr Berger VLD, Federal 210, Hodgdon Retumbo, bullets jammed 0.010"</u>:</p><p>Historical uncoated bullet MV=<u>3044</u>fps loaded with <u>74.6</u>gr Retumbo. </p><p>Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=3022fps loaded with 74.9gr Retumbo.</p><p>Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=3073fps loaded with 75.2gr Retumbo.</p><p>A 0.4% (0.3gr) increased powder charge provided ~22fps <em>decreased</em> MV.</p><p>A 0.8% (0.6gr) increased powder charge provided ~29fps <em>increased</em> MV.</p><p></p><p><u><strong>300 Win Mag</strong>, 210gr Berger VLD, Federal 215, IMR 7828, bullets jammed 0.008"</u>:</p><p>HIstorical uncoated bullet MV=<u>2936</u>fps loaded with <u>73.3</u>gr IMR 7828.</p><p>Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=2909fps loaded with 73.7gr IMR 7828.</p><p>Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=2953fps loaded with 74.1gr IMR 7828.</p><p>A 0.55% (0.4gr) increased powder charge provided ~27fps <em>decreased</em> MV.</p><p>A 1.1% (0.8gr) increased powder charge provided ~17fps <em>increased</em> MV.</p><p></p><p>I did not attempt to determine a maximum pressure load with either gun/cartridge. The goal of this chronograph session was to determine the powder charge that would re-establish my historical MVs in both rifles. No indications of excess pressure were experienced in either rifle. Higher MVs are possible with higher pressure loads.</p><p></p><p><u>Mathematical Findings</u>:</p><p>The 7mm Rem Mag required ~ <strong>0.58%</strong> (0.43gr) additional Retumbo in order to obtain my historical uncoated bullet MV.</p><p></p><p>The 300 Win Mag required ~ <strong>0.88%</strong> (0.65gr) additional IMR 7828 in order to obtain my historical uncoated bullet MV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 1075494, member: 4191"] Chronographed some HBN coated bullets, fired from HBN coated bores, in two different rifles. I have extensive chronograph MV data from both rifles from the prior 7 years firing the identical uncoated bullets. The MV of the first bullet fired from each freshly HBN-coated bore was NOT recorded. MVs were recorded over a set of triplicate chronographs, meaning three MVs were simultaneously recorded for each bullet fired using three separate chronographs. Chronograph agreement was excellent. Confidence in these MVs is high. My current disclaimer is that I only fired one bullet at each powder charge as this was my initial testing of HBN-coated bullet MV. But I expect this data to be reinforced with additional chronograph sessions, because my findings are similar to what others have reported. [U][B]7mm Rem Mag[/B], 168gr Berger VLD, Federal 210, Hodgdon Retumbo, bullets jammed 0.010"[/U]: Historical uncoated bullet MV=[U]3044[/U]fps loaded with [U]74.6[/U]gr Retumbo. Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=3022fps loaded with 74.9gr Retumbo. Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=3073fps loaded with 75.2gr Retumbo. A 0.4% (0.3gr) increased powder charge provided ~22fps [I]decreased[/I] MV. A 0.8% (0.6gr) increased powder charge provided ~29fps [I]increased[/I] MV. [U][B]300 Win Mag[/B], 210gr Berger VLD, Federal 215, IMR 7828, bullets jammed 0.008"[/U]: HIstorical uncoated bullet MV=[U]2936[/U]fps loaded with [U]73.3[/U]gr IMR 7828. Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=2909fps loaded with 73.7gr IMR 7828. Coated HBN bullet/bore MV=2953fps loaded with 74.1gr IMR 7828. A 0.55% (0.4gr) increased powder charge provided ~27fps [I]decreased[/I] MV. A 1.1% (0.8gr) increased powder charge provided ~17fps [I]increased[/I] MV. I did not attempt to determine a maximum pressure load with either gun/cartridge. The goal of this chronograph session was to determine the powder charge that would re-establish my historical MVs in both rifles. No indications of excess pressure were experienced in either rifle. Higher MVs are possible with higher pressure loads. [U]Mathematical Findings[/U]: The 7mm Rem Mag required ~ [B]0.58%[/B] (0.43gr) additional Retumbo in order to obtain my historical uncoated bullet MV. The 300 Win Mag required ~ [B]0.88%[/B] (0.65gr) additional IMR 7828 in order to obtain my historical uncoated bullet MV. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hexagonal Boron Nitride
Top