Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Help with analyzing lots of load data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CastIronSkillet" data-source="post: 1713228" data-attributes="member: 107017"><p>I have been reloading for several years but, I am new to handloading. My experience is with pistol and short range hunting and plinking loads. I got bit by the long range bug and the infection is spreading. I picked up a 700 5R 300 win and a 700P LTR .308 to practice with and save barrel on the win mag.</p><p></p><p>My objective is to find an accuracy load for this rifle that I can whip up pretty easily to go-to whenever I need... my pet load I guess. </p><p></p><p>The data below is with the .308 20" barrel</p><p>Alliant RL15</p><p>Federal Brass</p><p>Fed210M primer</p><p>168 SMK</p><p>hornady .333 bushing die w/expander (i don't neck turn) </p><p>hornady micro adjust seating die</p><p></p><p>I am looking for some second opinions on what I might be seeing in my data. I used the 10-shot ladder test to identify pressure and velocity nodes first. It ended up being 20 but who's counting? The first 10 were at saami spec length, the second 10 were max mag length. 42.4, 43.2, 44.2, and maybe 44.8 all showed some potential. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]149519[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]149520[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I decided to verify the 43.2 charge on a second trip. Two 5 shot groups at 100 yds with consistent velocity, SD, and ES. The velocity was a little higher but it was also almost 20* hotter outside. Groups sucked but that's OK for now. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]149521[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This next part is where I have questions. I did a seating depth test to find the accuracy load. The groups were marginally better by seating closer to the lands and strangely the exact same for three of them. I would like to post pics of the groups but I feel I have posted too much already. The .89" groups were all .4" 4-shot and a flyer to open them up to .89". I have never gotten this far in testing before... where do I go from here? </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]149525[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CastIronSkillet, post: 1713228, member: 107017"] I have been reloading for several years but, I am new to handloading. My experience is with pistol and short range hunting and plinking loads. I got bit by the long range bug and the infection is spreading. I picked up a 700 5R 300 win and a 700P LTR .308 to practice with and save barrel on the win mag. My objective is to find an accuracy load for this rifle that I can whip up pretty easily to go-to whenever I need... my pet load I guess. The data below is with the .308 20" barrel Alliant RL15 Federal Brass Fed210M primer 168 SMK hornady .333 bushing die w/expander (i don't neck turn) hornady micro adjust seating die I am looking for some second opinions on what I might be seeing in my data. I used the 10-shot ladder test to identify pressure and velocity nodes first. It ended up being 20 but who's counting? The first 10 were at saami spec length, the second 10 were max mag length. 42.4, 43.2, 44.2, and maybe 44.8 all showed some potential. [ATTACH=full]149519[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]149520[/ATTACH] I decided to verify the 43.2 charge on a second trip. Two 5 shot groups at 100 yds with consistent velocity, SD, and ES. The velocity was a little higher but it was also almost 20* hotter outside. Groups sucked but that's OK for now. [ATTACH=full]149521[/ATTACH] This next part is where I have questions. I did a seating depth test to find the accuracy load. The groups were marginally better by seating closer to the lands and strangely the exact same for three of them. I would like to post pics of the groups but I feel I have posted too much already. The .89" groups were all .4" 4-shot and a flyer to open them up to .89". I have never gotten this far in testing before... where do I go from here? [ATTACH=full]149525[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Help with analyzing lots of load data
Top