Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Help me understand.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bravo 4" data-source="post: 2054284" data-attributes="member: 8873"><p>I hear ya, the same amount of grid may be visible just not on max power. </p><p>I wish it was as simple as you say. However manufacturers do not always just take a SFP reticle and place it in a FFP. The subtentions may be the same but the reticle genetic make up like width of lines and such will very. Also one reticle may be different in a manufacturer's different scopes, not just different between SFP and FFP but in the different magnification models. Don't take this as me being argumentative, I just look at things differently. When someone says compare apples to apples, I don't look at FFP vs SFP as such as they are different and serve different purposes. If so maybe a Granny Smith compared to a delicious red, just enough likeness to call them both apples.<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😁" title="Beaming face with smiling eyes :grin:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f601.png" data-shortname=":grin:" /> I'm also not advocating one over the other, my ELR rig has a SFP reticle (its moa/moa) and until all my work optics go FFP mil/mil I don't plan on a change. Once the Army pulls their heads out of their 4th point of contact I may change just to have consistency across the board...maybe!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bravo 4, post: 2054284, member: 8873"] I hear ya, the same amount of grid may be visible just not on max power. I wish it was as simple as you say. However manufacturers do not always just take a SFP reticle and place it in a FFP. The subtentions may be the same but the reticle genetic make up like width of lines and such will very. Also one reticle may be different in a manufacturer’s different scopes, not just different between SFP and FFP but in the different magnification models. Don’t take this as me being argumentative, I just look at things differently. When someone says compare apples to apples, I don’t look at FFP vs SFP as such as they are different and serve different purposes. If so maybe a Granny Smith compared to a delicious red, just enough likeness to call them both apples.😁 I’m also not advocating one over the other, my ELR rig has a SFP reticle (its moa/moa) and until all my work optics go FFP mil/mil I don’t plan on a change. Once the Army pulls their heads out of their 4th point of contact I may change just to have consistency across the board...maybe! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Help me understand.
Top