Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Help me decide.....Please. Leupold or Nightforce
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="antitactical" data-source="post: 1207713" data-attributes="member: 52795"><p>I've got them all. Nightforce, leupold, had Vortex, Huskemaw and March. The SHV is a turd as far as I'm concerned. They have lesser glass than a NXS or a benchrest. The NXS that ive had and messed with had bad fish bowl like distortion at the lower powers (and that's at least 6 NXS scopes I've messed with). The Benchrest models have greater clarity but no travel. The ATACAR doesn't fishbowl and I haven messed with a BEAST. The newer Huskemaw I've dealt with had a bad discoloring (yellowing) but the older ones were clear. The Mark 4 is older tech. I've sent back a bunch of Leupolds (usually for tracking) and they almost always come back right. As far as short range benchrest goes March is king with frozen Leupolds behind them. The 2 March scopes I've dealt with were very clear and worked great (2.5-25 hunting and a 10-60 benchrest). The Vortex is a roll of the dice for a clear one. I've seen very clear ones and I've seen ones as crappy as a Simmons. The Razors are clear but heavy. I want to try out the new Burris and see how it fares. But back to the original question. I would go with the Mark4 and give it a work out and make sure it tracks. If it doesn't, return it and your good to go. They are clearer than the SHV in my opinion and probably tougher.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="antitactical, post: 1207713, member: 52795"] I've got them all. Nightforce, leupold, had Vortex, Huskemaw and March. The SHV is a turd as far as I'm concerned. They have lesser glass than a NXS or a benchrest. The NXS that ive had and messed with had bad fish bowl like distortion at the lower powers (and that's at least 6 NXS scopes I've messed with). The Benchrest models have greater clarity but no travel. The ATACAR doesn't fishbowl and I haven messed with a BEAST. The newer Huskemaw I've dealt with had a bad discoloring (yellowing) but the older ones were clear. The Mark 4 is older tech. I've sent back a bunch of Leupolds (usually for tracking) and they almost always come back right. As far as short range benchrest goes March is king with frozen Leupolds behind them. The 2 March scopes I've dealt with were very clear and worked great (2.5-25 hunting and a 10-60 benchrest). The Vortex is a roll of the dice for a clear one. I've seen very clear ones and I've seen ones as crappy as a Simmons. The Razors are clear but heavy. I want to try out the new Burris and see how it fares. But back to the original question. I would go with the Mark4 and give it a work out and make sure it tracks. If it doesn't, return it and your good to go. They are clearer than the SHV in my opinion and probably tougher. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Help me decide.....Please. Leupold or Nightforce
Top