Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hammer bullet concern
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CMP70306" data-source="post: 2255793" data-attributes="member: 36999"><p>You do realize that doesn't make any sense right? If the thread was talking about the absolutes and what they are and their performance on game and BC then I would say move it. The issue is that thread already exists in the "Rifle, Bullets Barrels & Ballistics" section.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.longrangehunting.com/threads/introducing-the-absolute-hammer.248519/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>The Absolute Hammer Load Data thread was specifically spun off of that to the reloading section so that people didn't have to wade through 97 pages of discussion to find some data. The entire thread is people posting their bullet, cartridge, case brand, primers, load data, and velocity numbers for people to review while GLTaylor acts as the scribe for all of us ballistic misfits throwing numbers at him. He then presents it in a clear and continuously updated document on the first page as a sort of unofficial Absolute Hammer load book. (Hats off to him)</p><p></p><p>To say that collection of load data doesn't belong in the Reloading section because it is only about one type of bullet literally makes no sense. Would you prefer we break it all out and a have several hundred threads each asking about one bullet in one cartridge like we do with Berger, Hornady, Sierra, Nosler and Barnes instead of all of it in a single thread?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CMP70306, post: 2255793, member: 36999"] You do realize that doesn’t make any sense right? If the thread was talking about the absolutes and what they are and their performance on game and BC then I would say move it. The issue is that thread already exists in the “Rifle, Bullets Barrels & Ballistics” section. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.longrangehunting.com/threads/introducing-the-absolute-hammer.248519/[/URL] The Absolute Hammer Load Data thread was specifically spun off of that to the reloading section so that people didn’t have to wade through 97 pages of discussion to find some data. The entire thread is people posting their bullet, cartridge, case brand, primers, load data, and velocity numbers for people to review while GLTaylor acts as the scribe for all of us ballistic misfits throwing numbers at him. He then presents it in a clear and continuously updated document on the first page as a sort of unofficial Absolute Hammer load book. (Hats off to him) To say that collection of load data doesn’t belong in the Reloading section because it is only about one type of bullet literally makes no sense. Would you prefer we break it all out and a have several hundred threads each asking about one bullet in one cartridge like we do with Berger, Hornady, Sierra, Nosler and Barnes instead of all of it in a single thread? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hammer bullet concern
Top