Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 vs RL22
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="358 Guy" data-source="post: 1779427" data-attributes="member: 60067"><p>Awhile back I developed some hunting loads for a friends 6.5 CM. The rifle is a TC Compass that I had glass bedded. H-4350 provided the best combination of velocity and accuracy compared to REL-22 using 125 gr. Nosler Partitions. When I tried 140 gr. Partitions, the opposite was true. He currently hunts with the 125 gr. / H-4350 load and it works quite well for him. I'm trying to talk him into trying the 140's again using REL-23. As I previously posted, REL-22 has proven to me to be quite temperature sensitive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="358 Guy, post: 1779427, member: 60067"] Awhile back I developed some hunting loads for a friends 6.5 CM. The rifle is a TC Compass that I had glass bedded. H-4350 provided the best combination of velocity and accuracy compared to REL-22 using 125 gr. Nosler Partitions. When I tried 140 gr. Partitions, the opposite was true. He currently hunts with the 125 gr. / H-4350 load and it works quite well for him. I'm trying to talk him into trying the 140's again using REL-23. As I previously posted, REL-22 has proven to me to be quite temperature sensitive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 vs RL22
Top