Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H1000 VS N570 ( 28 nosler)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eshorebwhntr" data-source="post: 1971361" data-attributes="member: 17112"><p>7977 is the equivalent burn rate of H1000. Min charge for both are typically identical in the reloading data I've seen published. </p><p></p><p>8133 is very close to Retumbo supposedly. </p><p></p><p>That whole IMR line was touted to have improved temp stability. Probably not as good as the Hodgdon extreme line but very good from 20-80F. </p><p></p><p>It was also supposed to have anti-coppering agents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eshorebwhntr, post: 1971361, member: 17112"] 7977 is the equivalent burn rate of H1000. Min charge for both are typically identical in the reloading data I've seen published. 8133 is very close to Retumbo supposedly. That whole IMR line was touted to have improved temp stability. Probably not as good as the Hodgdon extreme line but very good from 20-80F. It was also supposed to have anti-coppering agents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H1000 VS N570 ( 28 nosler)
Top