Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
H.R. 8167 Pittman Robertson Act.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orange Dust" data-source="post: 2604553" data-attributes="member: 92702"><p>Actually, it is SUPPOSED to fund the Federal Refuge System, but I agree with you, and we are few. The act taxes a vast array of sporting goods, not just guns. Hunters are for the tax, 2nd A supporters that do not hunt, someone buying binos to watch a football game, etc. not so much. I'm sure if the funding was eliminated our State would come up with a scheme to replace it. The State isn't in the business of laying off employees either. It would be either a general tax, which I'm against, or an increase in license fees, which I am for. Today our Game and Fish is funded solely through this and Fed money. They don't answer to anyone but hunters and fishermen. I kinda like it that way. The antis have no standing here and no voice. Whatever happens we need to keep it that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orange Dust, post: 2604553, member: 92702"] Actually, it is SUPPOSED to fund the Federal Refuge System, but I agree with you, and we are few. The act taxes a vast array of sporting goods, not just guns. Hunters are for the tax, 2nd A supporters that do not hunt, someone buying binos to watch a football game, etc. not so much. I'm sure if the funding was eliminated our State would come up with a scheme to replace it. The State isn't in the business of laying off employees either. It would be either a general tax, which I'm against, or an increase in license fees, which I am for. Today our Game and Fish is funded solely through this and Fed money. They don't answer to anyone but hunters and fishermen. I kinda like it that way. The antis have no standing here and no voice. Whatever happens we need to keep it that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
H.R. 8167 Pittman Robertson Act.
Top