Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gunwerks LR-1000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 535214" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>The thread started out with 2 questions; Is it worth it, and how does it shoot.</p><p>It seems pretty clear that 'is it worth it' is relative to what you get, which leads to how well it shoots -here.</p><p>Well don't forget folks, 'how does it shoot' is still unknown, therefore it's value(here) is still unknown.</p><p></p><p>Anyone could imply, and everyone does, that 'we expect our guns to do this or that'...</p><p>But this is not an answer to how well does it shoot.</p><p>This implies to me that the customer is still left with all the efforts it would take with less exensive guns to get them to shoot well. So there is no saving or value gained there.</p><p>A customer is merely paying more here, for unknown performance, irregardless of their expectations.</p><p></p><p>Now this is no different than many many other gunbuilders. Just look at how many of them are doing the same thing. Gunwerks has implied that their prices are inline with the others, and w/resp to the others, I see nothing different one way or another.</p><p>It is just further divvying up of the same market and doesn't stand out in my mind as a 'good value'.</p><p></p><p>I like the Cooper route over this for sure.</p><p>But even with this, we are still left with all the REAL work (load development).</p><p>If Gunwerks did THIS for customers, and sold guns based on their actual capability, that would seperate them from countless others. </p><p>At that point, they might be considered differently.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 535214, member: 1521"] The thread started out with 2 questions; Is it worth it, and how does it shoot. It seems pretty clear that 'is it worth it' is relative to what you get, which leads to how well it shoots -here. Well don't forget folks, 'how does it shoot' is still unknown, therefore it's value(here) is still unknown. Anyone could imply, and everyone does, that 'we expect our guns to do this or that'... But this is not an answer to how well does it shoot. This implies to me that the customer is still left with all the efforts it would take with less exensive guns to get them to shoot well. So there is no saving or value gained there. A customer is merely paying more here, for unknown performance, irregardless of their expectations. Now this is no different than many many other gunbuilders. Just look at how many of them are doing the same thing. Gunwerks has implied that their prices are inline with the others, and w/resp to the others, I see nothing different one way or another. It is just further divvying up of the same market and doesn't stand out in my mind as a 'good value'. I like the Cooper route over this for sure. But even with this, we are still left with all the REAL work (load development). If Gunwerks did THIS for customers, and sold guns based on their actual capability, that would seperate them from countless others. At that point, they might be considered differently. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gunwerks LR-1000
Top