Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Get out and Vote on Tuesday!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ballistic64" data-source="post: 126388" data-attributes="member: 3401"><p>I agree with you jeffbird,there are some very fuzzy lines between canidates when it comes to the 2nd Amendment.Although the NRA may rate a challenger or incumbent very high,it is by no means a guarantee when, elected/reelected,the representative is going to uphold or support pro-gun issues or any other issues the state elected them for.</p><p>A very good case in my own state of SD are two career polititions Tom Daschle and Tim Johnson.Both stood very firm and upheld pro-gun legislation for years and represented the states wishes,but eventually swayed to special interests and out of state pact money.I'd go as far as to say that Mr. Daschle thought he was untouchable at election time,but voting records arent top secret and dont lie.It was obvious he wasnt representing SD,and was ousted.</p><p>I agree with Jim that you shouldnt vote for a representative based solely on a single issue,but to me the pro-gun vote ranks right up there.There is only one reason politicians want people disarmed.You'll find it through out history,and it **** sure isnt crime control.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ballistic64, post: 126388, member: 3401"] I agree with you jeffbird,there are some very fuzzy lines between canidates when it comes to the 2nd Amendment.Although the NRA may rate a challenger or incumbent very high,it is by no means a guarantee when, elected/reelected,the representative is going to uphold or support pro-gun issues or any other issues the state elected them for. A very good case in my own state of SD are two career polititions Tom Daschle and Tim Johnson.Both stood very firm and upheld pro-gun legislation for years and represented the states wishes,but eventually swayed to special interests and out of state pact money.I'd go as far as to say that Mr. Daschle thought he was untouchable at election time,but voting records arent top secret and dont lie.It was obvious he wasnt representing SD,and was ousted. I agree with Jim that you shouldnt vote for a representative based solely on a single issue,but to me the pro-gun vote ranks right up there.There is only one reason politicians want people disarmed.You'll find it through out history,and it **** sure isnt crime control. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Get out and Vote on Tuesday!!!
Top