Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Garmin Xero - update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="C-130 Dude" data-source="post: 2975430" data-attributes="member: 122991"><p>Not exactly true-sort of. I have been using Multical, VisiCalc, and Excel since they were developed in the late 70's and early 80's. We found that all of them (and any other program similar) are only able to run the data "provided". As it's said in the industry, "garbage in-garbage out". If the raw data from each is skewed, bad results will be calculated no matter how they are considered. The issue here is more basic. And it may very well be in the data generation itself by each chrono. The only way this ongoing debate will be judged is to use some sort of industry reference standard measurement chronograph. And measure the contenders against it, not each other. Only then can this be settled. I would imagine these are available, but at what cost. I'm sure all the chrono manufacturers do their utmost to ensure their product does its best. But if it comes down to 100% perfection, I don't think there is a winner. If there was, we would have heard about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="C-130 Dude, post: 2975430, member: 122991"] Not exactly true-sort of. I have been using Multical, VisiCalc, and Excel since they were developed in the late 70's and early 80's. We found that all of them (and any other program similar) are only able to run the data "provided". As it's said in the industry, "garbage in-garbage out". If the raw data from each is skewed, bad results will be calculated no matter how they are considered. The issue here is more basic. And it may very well be in the data generation itself by each chrono. The only way this ongoing debate will be judged is to use some sort of industry reference standard measurement chronograph. And measure the contenders against it, not each other. Only then can this be settled. I would imagine these are available, but at what cost. I'm sure all the chrono manufacturers do their utmost to ensure their product does its best. But if it comes down to 100% perfection, I don't think there is a winner. If there was, we would have heard about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Garmin Xero - update
Top