Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
G7 BR2500 VS SIG KILO2400ABS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doug Herold" data-source="post: 1492385" data-attributes="member: 102658"><p>I have owned the Leica 2000b, the Kilo 2400, and the Gunwerks Br2. Ultimately, I think your satisfaction will come down to personal preference. I prefer the BR2, however my son prefers the Kilo. Here's why:</p><p>If you enjoy gadgetry, the Kilo is for you. I'm an old fart and I like to keep things simple. The Bluetooth on the Kilo is very difficult to connect . Also, to perform a custom ballistic curve for your load is cumbersome and complicated. However, like I said, if you like gadgetry, this one is for you. Also, the Kilo is much smaller, therefore packing easier. It does a better job ranging through tight places, but I found it lacking under poor conditions like fog or rain.</p><p> Conversely, for me, I find the Gunwerks rangefinder more user friendly. It is easier to program and gives the same "shoot to" solution as the Kilo without the hi-tech headaches. Both rangefinders compensate well for atmospheric conditions... and that is the bottom line. If your not going to shoot beyond 500 yds you dont need that ability, and you can shoot a straight yardage turret and don't have to mess with the effects of air density (Leica). Anyway, hope this is of some benefit. These have been my experiences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doug Herold, post: 1492385, member: 102658"] I have owned the Leica 2000b, the Kilo 2400, and the Gunwerks Br2. Ultimately, I think your satisfaction will come down to personal preference. I prefer the BR2, however my son prefers the Kilo. Here’s why: If you enjoy gadgetry, the Kilo is for you. I’m an old fart and I like to keep things simple. The Bluetooth on the Kilo is very difficult to connect . Also, to perform a custom ballistic curve for your load is cumbersome and complicated. However, like I said, if you like gadgetry, this one is for you. Also, the Kilo is much smaller, therefore packing easier. It does a better job ranging through tight places, but I found it lacking under poor conditions like fog or rain. Conversely, for me, I find the Gunwerks rangefinder more user friendly. It is easier to program and gives the same “shoot to” solution as the Kilo without the hi-tech headaches. Both rangefinders compensate well for atmospheric conditions... and that is the bottom line. If your not going to shoot beyond 500 yds you dont need that ability, and you can shoot a straight yardage turret and don’t have to mess with the effects of air density (Leica). Anyway, hope this is of some benefit. These have been my experiences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
G7 BR2500 VS SIG KILO2400ABS
Top