Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fluted Bartlein vs Proof Research sendero contours
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elk Hunter 338" data-source="post: 1427037" data-attributes="member: 23509"><p>In my opinion (And ive seen a bunch of them) <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> if you cant pack an extra pound of rifle ie=more stability for LR shooting if needed, then maybe a little better physical training is needed!! or take an extra pound of worthless crap outta your pack that you never use, like everyone does!!! LOL</p><p>in all seriousness the difference between proofs and a lighter steel barrel is merely ounces!!! the benefits will go to the proof for</p><p>A. the muzzle diameter aids in a way bigger brake for more reduces recoil without looking like a growth on the end of the barrel</p><p>B. a little more stiffness than a small dia steel ( although i have tested both and with the longer barrels steel and carbon the carbon has more POI shift than the steel when adding a suppressor such as ultra 9 TBAC or Ultra338 TBAC</p><p>C. the carbon balances basically dead center of any rig long or short where as the steel is just smidge forward, not a huge deal to me but most will notice it a little</p><p>D. Basically run what you want and be happy. the carbons look sweet I RUN BOTH and there is no CONCLUSIVE ACTUAL TESTED ON BARRELS scientific data that concludes whether or not the thermal properties reduce heat faster blah blah blah as this has derailed before!</p><p>E. they wear out about the same rate and accuracy is identical in most cases for hunting rifle uses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elk Hunter 338, post: 1427037, member: 23509"] In my opinion (And ive seen a bunch of them) :) if you cant pack an extra pound of rifle ie=more stability for LR shooting if needed, then maybe a little better physical training is needed!! or take an extra pound of worthless crap outta your pack that you never use, like everyone does!!! LOL in all seriousness the difference between proofs and a lighter steel barrel is merely ounces!!! the benefits will go to the proof for A. the muzzle diameter aids in a way bigger brake for more reduces recoil without looking like a growth on the end of the barrel B. a little more stiffness than a small dia steel ( although i have tested both and with the longer barrels steel and carbon the carbon has more POI shift than the steel when adding a suppressor such as ultra 9 TBAC or Ultra338 TBAC C. the carbon balances basically dead center of any rig long or short where as the steel is just smidge forward, not a huge deal to me but most will notice it a little D. Basically run what you want and be happy. the carbons look sweet I RUN BOTH and there is no CONCLUSIVE ACTUAL TESTED ON BARRELS scientific data that concludes whether or not the thermal properties reduce heat faster blah blah blah as this has derailed before! E. they wear out about the same rate and accuracy is identical in most cases for hunting rifle uses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fluted Bartlein vs Proof Research sendero contours
Top