Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fluted Bartlein vs Proof Research sendero contours
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 1399380" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>You will not argue with me? Isn't that what you've been doing, with significant effort and time?</p><p>You don't care a split second about how fast your barrels cool? Then why engage in the effort to mislead others into thinking their carbon wrapped barrels cool faster than comparable sized steel barrels.</p><p>You understand the conundrum? Your Posts don't support your declaratory post/speech from the mountaintop.</p><p></p><p>"Y<em>ou seem to think, for some unknown reason, that I care for a split second about how fast my barrel cools.</em>" Never said that. Never thought that. I care to an extent when CF barrel manufacturers attempt to increase sales with false advertising. Thought I was clear about that.</p><p></p><p>There is no "<strong>the only number</strong>". You do understand that the equation for thermal diffusivity includes that other pesky number - the thermal conductivity coefficient? Maybe you missed that... failed to understand it... or prefer to ignore it... </p><p></p><p>Nobody I've ever talked with expresses notable concern over the momentary heat of firing one single cartridge - and bore overheating. The overriding concern is repetitive fire. You think repetitive fire doesn't approach the conditions of your hypothetical constant heat source? Close enough for me and others that would calculate heat transfer. Very aptly suited for conductive heat transfer analysis using the thermal conductivity coefficient.</p><p></p><p>Your confidence must be grounded in the need to feel good about your carbon barrel cooling rates (those cooling rates that you care less than a split second about), because you haven't the background to differentiate between supportive facts and misleading facts. The consequence being you'll settle for whatever feels good, no matter how flawed. </p><p></p><p>Maybe you'd have handled yourself better here if it weren't for that room full of carbon fiber wrapped barrels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 1399380, member: 4191"] You will not argue with me? Isn't that what you've been doing, with significant effort and time? You don't care a split second about how fast your barrels cool? Then why engage in the effort to mislead others into thinking their carbon wrapped barrels cool faster than comparable sized steel barrels. You understand the conundrum? Your Posts don't support your declaratory post/speech from the mountaintop. "Y[I]ou seem to think, for some unknown reason, that I care for a split second about how fast my barrel cools.[/I]" Never said that. Never thought that. I care to an extent when CF barrel manufacturers attempt to increase sales with false advertising. Thought I was clear about that. There is no "[B]the only number[/B]". You do understand that the equation for thermal diffusivity includes that other pesky number - the thermal conductivity coefficient? Maybe you missed that... failed to understand it... or prefer to ignore it... Nobody I've ever talked with expresses notable concern over the momentary heat of firing one single cartridge - and bore overheating. The overriding concern is repetitive fire. You think repetitive fire doesn't approach the conditions of your hypothetical constant heat source? Close enough for me and others that would calculate heat transfer. Very aptly suited for conductive heat transfer analysis using the thermal conductivity coefficient. Your confidence must be grounded in the need to feel good about your carbon barrel cooling rates (those cooling rates that you care less than a split second about), because you haven't the background to differentiate between supportive facts and misleading facts. The consequence being you'll settle for whatever feels good, no matter how flawed. Maybe you'd have handled yourself better here if it weren't for that room full of carbon fiber wrapped barrels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fluted Bartlein vs Proof Research sendero contours
Top