Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="westcliffe01" data-source="post: 782246" data-attributes="member: 35183"><p>The ability to use less than max magnification while still having the reticle being dead on. For me that would be anywhere from 8x to 16x with the 4-16. My 6-24 arrives this evening so have not had time to play with it yet, but I suspect it will be similar 10-24x should have the reticle readable and in low light I have the illumination to fall back on if needed.</p><p></p><p>I am not restricted to specific calibrations at specific magnifications, which are very hard to apply in a fluid predator hunting experience. Changing magnification is a relatively easy thing to do and there is nothing precise about it. Just dial to a point you are comfortable. On the other hand, dialing up corrections on the turrets one has to be exactly right and remain aware of where you have them if they are not on zero in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I agree that if every shot that you take is on max magnification, then the extra $200 for the FFP may not be worth it for you. I typically shoot with a different magnification every time and can never tell where the coyotes are going to show up. My process starts with the scope adjusted to match my binoculars field of view. Once I see something with the binoculars, then I pick up the rifle and go from there. If I know there are livestock in the lane of fire, I will not zoom in as much as otherwise to maintain situational awareness. If I am sure it is clear I will dial up as much as practical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="westcliffe01, post: 782246, member: 35183"] The ability to use less than max magnification while still having the reticle being dead on. For me that would be anywhere from 8x to 16x with the 4-16. My 6-24 arrives this evening so have not had time to play with it yet, but I suspect it will be similar 10-24x should have the reticle readable and in low light I have the illumination to fall back on if needed. I am not restricted to specific calibrations at specific magnifications, which are very hard to apply in a fluid predator hunting experience. Changing magnification is a relatively easy thing to do and there is nothing precise about it. Just dial to a point you are comfortable. On the other hand, dialing up corrections on the turrets one has to be exactly right and remain aware of where you have them if they are not on zero in the first place. I agree that if every shot that you take is on max magnification, then the extra $200 for the FFP may not be worth it for you. I typically shoot with a different magnification every time and can never tell where the coyotes are going to show up. My process starts with the scope adjusted to match my binoculars field of view. Once I see something with the binoculars, then I pick up the rifle and go from there. If I know there are livestock in the lane of fire, I will not zoom in as much as otherwise to maintain situational awareness. If I am sure it is clear I will dial up as much as practical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
Top