Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Possum Cop" data-source="post: 1868691" data-attributes="member: 108622"><p>I prefer the SFP for hunting and precision target shooting. MOA is easier for me, I can "see" the MOA in my "math mind". The MOA makes for finer adjustments than the MIL. </p><p>The FFP is harder to math for me because in America we don't use the metric system often. </p><p>I do have both but I do not like that the crosshairs obscure small targets at long range in the FFP, you just have to hold where you think the target is when it covers it up. </p><p>The SFP, the crosshair does not get huge as you turn the power up like the FFP. </p><p>I have the Nightforce NXS 8-32x56 MOAR-T .250 MOA and the Nightforce NX8 4-32x50 MIL-XT .1 MIL and I do my precision shooting with the SFP. </p><p>I have Leupold Mark 4 Mil reticle MOA dials, that's how they made them for years and I've never had any problems with them. I have never had any problems ranging with them or making precision shots with them but I use them as I was trained. </p><p></p><p>There are pros and cons to each and it ends up being personal preference over anything else. </p><p></p><p>What is comfortable for you? </p><p></p><p>What do you like the best? </p><p></p><p>What helps you hit the target that you are shooting at? </p><p></p><p>Best of luck with your choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Possum Cop, post: 1868691, member: 108622"] I prefer the SFP for hunting and precision target shooting. MOA is easier for me, I can “see” the MOA in my “math mind”. The MOA makes for finer adjustments than the MIL. The FFP is harder to math for me because in America we don’t use the metric system often. I do have both but I do not like that the crosshairs obscure small targets at long range in the FFP, you just have to hold where you think the target is when it covers it up. The SFP, the crosshair does not get huge as you turn the power up like the FFP. I have the Nightforce NXS 8-32x56 MOAR-T .250 MOA and the Nightforce NX8 4-32x50 MIL-XT .1 MIL and I do my precision shooting with the SFP. I have Leupold Mark 4 Mil reticle MOA dials, that’s how they made them for years and I’ve never had any problems with them. I have never had any problems ranging with them or making precision shots with them but I use them as I was trained. There are pros and cons to each and it ends up being personal preference over anything else. What is comfortable for you? What do you like the best? What helps you hit the target that you are shooting at? Best of luck with your choice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP
Top