Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP for ranging
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mjkten" data-source="post: 1125599" data-attributes="member: 85946"><p>I have been studying the use of the FFP reticle for ranging. I'd like to become proficient at it. I wonder whether those who have a SFP mil dot (or other demarcated type) reticle with a modest top end for magnification are at any disadvantage?</p><p>Lets say you have a 10x top end. If you need to range your target, wouldn't you most often be at the top magnification anyway, just to be sure of your target? </p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Mike.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mjkten, post: 1125599, member: 85946"] I have been studying the use of the FFP reticle for ranging. I'd like to become proficient at it. I wonder whether those who have a SFP mil dot (or other demarcated type) reticle with a modest top end for magnification are at any disadvantage? Lets say you have a 10x top end. If you need to range your target, wouldn't you most often be at the top magnification anyway, just to be sure of your target? Thanks, Mike. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP for ranging
Top