Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fat bottom gurls....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigDaddyKane" data-source="post: 518405" data-attributes="member: 32232"><p>Ok let me rephrase... the most <strong>reliable </strong>load is more important in my opinion... not just the fastest. You claim that typically at higher MV's you're more likely to have flatter trajectory and better chances for accuracy. I agree. I believe we are arguing the same point just in different manners. What I was trying to get at is that I'd much rather sacrifice some MV if I am dead nuts accurate and consistent with a lesser MV load. Some times different powder combinations used in order to achieve a higher MV may be more sensitive to temperature changes and climate. With that in mind it all depends on what you are trying to achieve. Overall, I'm personally more satisfied with a load combination that I can more easily predict and can rely on. BUT... in agreement with what you are trying to say... a faster MV will typically produce flatter trajectory and less drift (provided they are the same bullets conditions etc etc). With that in mind they will more likely remain at the same point of impact. This I completely agree on. I was just making the point that if I find a powder combination that has a lower MV but produces tighter grouped shots, and is less affected by variable such as temperature, I'll gladly sacrifice the velocity. Agreed?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigDaddyKane, post: 518405, member: 32232"] Ok let me rephrase... the most [B]reliable [/B]load is more important in my opinion... not just the fastest. You claim that typically at higher MV's you're more likely to have flatter trajectory and better chances for accuracy. I agree. I believe we are arguing the same point just in different manners. What I was trying to get at is that I'd much rather sacrifice some MV if I am dead nuts accurate and consistent with a lesser MV load. Some times different powder combinations used in order to achieve a higher MV may be more sensitive to temperature changes and climate. With that in mind it all depends on what you are trying to achieve. Overall, I'm personally more satisfied with a load combination that I can more easily predict and can rely on. BUT... in agreement with what you are trying to say... a faster MV will typically produce flatter trajectory and less drift (provided they are the same bullets conditions etc etc). With that in mind they will more likely remain at the same point of impact. This I completely agree on. I was just making the point that if I find a powder combination that has a lower MV but produces tighter grouped shots, and is less affected by variable such as temperature, I'll gladly sacrifice the velocity. Agreed? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Fat bottom gurls....
Top