Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Extreme spread and standard deviation vs accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SmokinCrow" data-source="post: 2927046" data-attributes="member: 62139"><p>That's not what they said. For true statistical significance you need 35 shots or there about. After that they didn't see statistically significant change. And they tested 50, 100, 250 shots etc. </p><p></p><p>They said they pick a charge about 1 grain under max and shoot 20. If in 20 you're not shooting something that's sufficient you already know it's not going to work for you. If it's working 35 will give you best statistical data to know the load. If after 20 they would change things. Powsder or Primer generally made biggest impacts. Lower charges showed less dispersion which is why they basically picked the charge under max. They said depending on how the load shot you would definitely know even by 10 shots if it wasn't going to work. </p><p></p><p>I had my doubts about their method, but I tried it, and I haven't chased my tail finding variations between shooting days as when I loaded 5 shot ladder teats. And going back to verify etc. not saying it's the only way, but it worked for me and has helped make a difference. Thinking statistically just made sense to me, they alsosaid if something works for you great. Just sharing what they had found</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SmokinCrow, post: 2927046, member: 62139"] That’s not what they said. For true statistical significance you need 35 shots or there about. After that they didn’t see statistically significant change. And they tested 50, 100, 250 shots etc. They said they pick a charge about 1 grain under max and shoot 20. If in 20 you’re not shooting something that’s sufficient you already know it’s not going to work for you. If it’s working 35 will give you best statistical data to know the load. If after 20 they would change things. Powsder or Primer generally made biggest impacts. Lower charges showed less dispersion which is why they basically picked the charge under max. They said depending on how the load shot you would definitely know even by 10 shots if it wasn’t going to work. I had my doubts about their method, but I tried it, and I haven’t chased my tail finding variations between shooting days as when I loaded 5 shot ladder teats. And going back to verify etc. not saying it’s the only way, but it worked for me and has helped make a difference. Thinking statistically just made sense to me, they alsosaid if something works for you great. Just sharing what they had found [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Extreme spread and standard deviation vs accuracy
Top