Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Extreme spread and standard deviation vs accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TopPin" data-source="post: 2925093" data-attributes="member: 109070"><p>Personal experience with the 6.5 Prc, h4831 great powder, h1000, Retumbo, n550, n560. Don't see the advantage in running a 215 primer. Fed 210 primers seem to run a better es and sd in the powder column. Personally I don't see a reason to run a magnum primer in cartridges that are less than 70-75 grains of powder. The powder column is not very long, and the burn rate of powder is faster in short magnum cartridges. The only time I run H1000 or Retumbo is on finicky barrels. H4831 is like hitting the staples easy button.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TopPin, post: 2925093, member: 109070"] Personal experience with the 6.5 Prc, h4831 great powder, h1000, Retumbo, n550, n560. Don’t see the advantage in running a 215 primer. Fed 210 primers seem to run a better es and sd in the powder column. Personally I don’t see a reason to run a magnum primer in cartridges that are less than 70-75 grains of powder. The powder column is not very long, and the burn rate of powder is faster in short magnum cartridges. The only time I run H1000 or Retumbo is on finicky barrels. H4831 is like hitting the staples easy button. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Extreme spread and standard deviation vs accuracy
Top