Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Experiment for quantifying lot to lot variations of powders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Courtney" data-source="post: 683255" data-attributes="member: 28191"><p>You're right of course, but testing three brands would cost three times the time and effort. </p><p></p><p>Hodgdon has published a graph claiming 8 fps lot to lot variation. Testing several powders from the Extreme line would at least determine if that result is typical or cherry picked.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Courtney, post: 683255, member: 28191"] You're right of course, but testing three brands would cost three times the time and effort. Hodgdon has published a graph claiming 8 fps lot to lot variation. Testing several powders from the Extreme line would at least determine if that result is typical or cherry picked. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Experiment for quantifying lot to lot variations of powders
Top