Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expanding vs Turning Mandrels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Polaris_Doc" data-source="post: 2427498" data-attributes="member: 109055"><p>No problem, it is very interesting to read all the different stuff people try and everything that is so different. I can tell from personal experience using the amp annealer that it definitely takes out a lot of spring back. I've noticed it with a 270 and 300 WSM where on a regular full-length die the bullets could be pushed in by hand. Which leads me too believe that a bullet diameter mandrel would produce the same results on any of the brass in my situation. Which is why I'm leaning towards .003-4 under and then back up to .002-.0025 under mandrel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Polaris_Doc, post: 2427498, member: 109055"] No problem, it is very interesting to read all the different stuff people try and everything that is so different. I can tell from personal experience using the amp annealer that it definitely takes out a lot of spring back. I've noticed it with a 270 and 300 WSM where on a regular full-length die the bullets could be pushed in by hand. Which leads me too believe that a bullet diameter mandrel would produce the same results on any of the brass in my situation. Which is why I'm leaning towards .003-4 under and then back up to .002-.0025 under mandrel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expanding vs Turning Mandrels
Top