Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expanding vs Turning Mandrels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 2426687" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>204, 224, 6mm, 6.5. Haven't tested much on the 30's. Don't really shoot them anymore. I never felt the 30's were that sensitive tho. I just run a .002 mandrel on everything now and it seems to work fine. I'm not a bench shooter tho so maybe my acceptable accuracy is less than others. If I can get .5moa consistency with low sd I'm happy. I don't intentionally chase bugholes AT ALL COST anymore. I look for it but I'll stop once I get a solid performer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 2426687, member: 61747"] 204, 224, 6mm, 6.5. Haven't tested much on the 30's. Don't really shoot them anymore. I never felt the 30's were that sensitive tho. I just run a .002 mandrel on everything now and it seems to work fine. I'm not a bench shooter tho so maybe my acceptable accuracy is less than others. If I can get .5moa consistency with low sd I'm happy. I don't intentionally chase bugholes AT ALL COST anymore. I look for it but I'll stop once I get a solid performer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expanding vs Turning Mandrels
Top