Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 1235920" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>You and I are after exactly the same thing in the end. Yes the posts that you made after the one that I quoted had a different tone. My apologies if I miss interpreted your meaning in the post that I quoted.</p><p></p><p>I have said several times in this thread that I am open to scientific data that backs up the frangible bullet claims. I have never come close to excluding anything. I have also said that I would market such a bullet. We have the material and the design for such a bullet. I do not want to address someone who calls and says that my bullet did not penetrate enough and had a bad experience because of that. </p><p></p><p>I too have hundreds of big game kills with various bullets over the years with 100% success. Only one bullet that I considered a failure. Although the animal was dead so not a complete failure. It was a bullet 20 years ago that I determined did not open. That was one of the reasons that I searched so hard for what I considered the perfect bullet. Lots of frangible bullets that nearly blew deer and antelope in half. Using 180g class bullets from a 30-06. In my quest I found Shooting Holes in The Wounding Theory, which backed up what I had learned in the field, with scientific proof. As BnG said, it is not a perfect study. But it is the only one I know of, and it backs up my field data.</p><p></p><p>I am not done with my quest for better bullets, my quest is now in a place where I am making them. Headed out to test some today.</p><p></p><p>Jeff, we are equal in one aspect, I have not hunted with your bullet of choice, and you have not hunted with mine.</p><p></p><p>On the same team,</p><p></p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 1235920, member: 7999"] You and I are after exactly the same thing in the end. Yes the posts that you made after the one that I quoted had a different tone. My apologies if I miss interpreted your meaning in the post that I quoted. I have said several times in this thread that I am open to scientific data that backs up the frangible bullet claims. I have never come close to excluding anything. I have also said that I would market such a bullet. We have the material and the design for such a bullet. I do not want to address someone who calls and says that my bullet did not penetrate enough and had a bad experience because of that. I too have hundreds of big game kills with various bullets over the years with 100% success. Only one bullet that I considered a failure. Although the animal was dead so not a complete failure. It was a bullet 20 years ago that I determined did not open. That was one of the reasons that I searched so hard for what I considered the perfect bullet. Lots of frangible bullets that nearly blew deer and antelope in half. Using 180g class bullets from a 30-06. In my quest I found Shooting Holes in The Wounding Theory, which backed up what I had learned in the field, with scientific proof. As BnG said, it is not a perfect study. But it is the only one I know of, and it backs up my field data. I am not done with my quest for better bullets, my quest is now in a place where I am making them. Headed out to test some today. Jeff, we are equal in one aspect, I have not hunted with your bullet of choice, and you have not hunted with mine. On the same team, Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
Top