Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 1235754" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>Is this a real viable comparison? You know , or you should know , this is a highly unlikely scenario. So are you only posting it to discredit what others have done?</p><p></p><p>I have offered this before to you. No, not out perform in all circumstances or impact velocities, shot angles etc.. Impact velocity is the key and you know it. Have you studied real world performance of bullets under 1800 fps impact velocities? 1700? 1600? Are you confident that a Hammer Bullet would have exited the bear I shot at a close to a mile, with a 1 to 1 1/4" exit hole? Impact velocity under 1650 fps? If you are saying you have a bullet that will work as well at 3000+ fps as it will below 1600, then by all means I am here to learn how this works.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You know as well as anyone, I shoot a large portion of the dozens of elk each year with a 30 cal and a 215. So, this is just a dig to discredit my experience again? I have always been eager to help you, and also eager to learn about your products. I have kept my posts fair and supported. No digs or references to the size of you or anyone's penis. Why do we feel the need to degrade one product to elevate another? My interest would be in learning how your bullets work and your actual performance tests conducted. Not so much about how you feel anyone who is not using your bullet is destine for failure. Just a suggestion from a nobody. But try impressing with performance, not debate by insult to users and other companies. </p><p></p><p>Just a lowly deplorable. </p><p>Regards.</p><p></p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 1235754, member: 7503"] Is this a real viable comparison? You know , or you should know , this is a highly unlikely scenario. So are you only posting it to discredit what others have done? I have offered this before to you. No, not out perform in all circumstances or impact velocities, shot angles etc.. Impact velocity is the key and you know it. Have you studied real world performance of bullets under 1800 fps impact velocities? 1700? 1600? Are you confident that a Hammer Bullet would have exited the bear I shot at a close to a mile, with a 1 to 1 1/4" exit hole? Impact velocity under 1650 fps? If you are saying you have a bullet that will work as well at 3000+ fps as it will below 1600, then by all means I am here to learn how this works. You know as well as anyone, I shoot a large portion of the dozens of elk each year with a 30 cal and a 215. So, this is just a dig to discredit my experience again? I have always been eager to help you, and also eager to learn about your products. I have kept my posts fair and supported. No digs or references to the size of you or anyone's penis. Why do we feel the need to degrade one product to elevate another? My interest would be in learning how your bullets work and your actual performance tests conducted. Not so much about how you feel anyone who is not using your bullet is destine for failure. Just a suggestion from a nobody. But try impressing with performance, not debate by insult to users and other companies. Just a lowly deplorable. Regards. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
Top