Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
eletronic powder trickler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="engineer40" data-source="post: 1118410" data-attributes="member: 90399"><p>I'm sure you're correct. The videos I spoke of looked to be from the 1990's. I only posted the information because it was interesting to me and I think would probably would be for others. </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure where at during these 4 hours of videos he talks about it, but he talks about what I mentioned previously. </p><p></p><p>Looking back at my notes, I did say one thing wrong. He uses a scale for above 60 grains, not 65 grains. </p><p></p><p>But he does say with his testing; "1 grain in powder charge difference out of a 243 will make 1.5 inch difference at 250 yards. That's 1 whole grain, not 1/10th of a grain. And that good powder measurers will throw within 2/10ths every time." </p><p></p><p>He gives an example that the US Team loaded 300,000 rifle rounds for competition on a progressive press just throwing the charges. That ammo produced 2 inch groups at 600 yards. </p><p></p><p>One more thing, just because I found it interesting, is he also said... In his opinion, probably the biggest thing that people do wrong and produce not accurate ammo is using a resizing die that the center ball stretches the neck too far. </p><p></p><p>[ame]https://youtu.be/NUnrYp0NH38[/ame] </p><p></p><p>[ame]https://youtu.be/Igse-APgpEc[/ame]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="engineer40, post: 1118410, member: 90399"] I'm sure you're correct. The videos I spoke of looked to be from the 1990's. I only posted the information because it was interesting to me and I think would probably would be for others. I'm not sure where at during these 4 hours of videos he talks about it, but he talks about what I mentioned previously. Looking back at my notes, I did say one thing wrong. He uses a scale for above 60 grains, not 65 grains. But he does say with his testing; "1 grain in powder charge difference out of a 243 will make 1.5 inch difference at 250 yards. That's 1 whole grain, not 1/10th of a grain. And that good powder measurers will throw within 2/10ths every time." He gives an example that the US Team loaded 300,000 rifle rounds for competition on a progressive press just throwing the charges. That ammo produced 2 inch groups at 600 yards. One more thing, just because I found it interesting, is he also said... In his opinion, probably the biggest thing that people do wrong and produce not accurate ammo is using a resizing die that the center ball stretches the neck too far. [ame]https://youtu.be/NUnrYp0NH38[/ame] [ame]https://youtu.be/Igse-APgpEc[/ame] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
eletronic powder trickler
Top