Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Drop Chart Help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaneBrake" data-source="post: 2931319" data-attributes="member: 127859"><p>What's your zero atmospheric data vs atmospheric data look like when you make these shots? Double check that sight height, that seems abnormally low. Measure the centerline of the bore to the centerline of the scope. What's your MV variation? What scope? Tall target test? How much tracking error?</p><p></p><p> I can't replicate your drop data at all with the variables you gave. I can get either the longer distances to match or the shorter distances to match but not both. If your solver has an option for axial form factor you can tweak that as well to help the data match the real world. My opinion would be to ditch that 1" zero height at 100 zero and zero at a definable distance.</p><p></p><p>This is why I don't like relying ballistics solvers for longer distance. They can't always account for everything. They do have their place though,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaneBrake, post: 2931319, member: 127859"] What’s your zero atmospheric data vs atmospheric data look like when you make these shots? Double check that sight height, that seems abnormally low. Measure the centerline of the bore to the centerline of the scope. What’s your MV variation? What scope? Tall target test? How much tracking error? I can’t replicate your drop data at all with the variables you gave. I can get either the longer distances to match or the shorter distances to match but not both. If your solver has an option for axial form factor you can tweak that as well to help the data match the real world. My opinion would be to ditch that 1” zero height at 100 zero and zero at a definable distance. This is why I don’t like relying ballistics solvers for longer distance. They can’t always account for everything. They do have their place though, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Drop Chart Help
Top