Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Does "anyone" ever take Sectional Density into consideration!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mjkten" data-source="post: 1539327" data-attributes="member: 85946"><p>A round ball would have very low sectional density, while that same material shaped into a cylinder would have a much higher sectional density. Put an aerodynamic point on it and a shapely boattail rear end, and your BC is optimized. Sectional density usually is thought of in terms of penetration I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mjkten, post: 1539327, member: 85946"] A round ball would have very low sectional density, while that same material shaped into a cylinder would have a much higher sectional density. Put an aerodynamic point on it and a shapely boattail rear end, and your BC is optimized. Sectional density usually is thought of in terms of penetration I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Does "anyone" ever take Sectional Density into consideration!!
Top