Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Cutting Edge Bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="royinidaho" data-source="post: 452245" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Interesting.</p><p></p><p>I like to see those that step up to the plate, grab the bit in their teeth and advance to the next level.</p><p></p><p>I appreciate their warning regarding tight bores. That would be Lilja I suppose. Someone will have to be the pioneer on this.</p><p></p><p>The downer, though typical, is that the 277 cal is left short at the 130 gr level. But a 160-170 class projectile in 270 would take up about half the barrel length.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="royinidaho, post: 452245, member: 2011"] Interesting. I like to see those that step up to the plate, grab the bit in their teeth and advance to the next level. I appreciate their warning regarding tight bores. That would be Lilja I suppose. Someone will have to be the pioneer on this. The downer, though typical, is that the 277 cal is left short at the 130 gr level. But a 160-170 class projectile in 270 would take up about half the barrel length.:D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Cutting Edge Bullets
Top