Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Corner crossing case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FlGunner" data-source="post: 2828690" data-attributes="member: 94240"><p>Well if it's public land, it needs public access. Period. Land bought in a checkerboard type of sense should not be allowed to lock out access to the public. It was obviously well thought out way back whenever to buy land that way to control it. Best win for everyone would be if the land owner and Fed's could work a deal to swap portions to make the land continuous and not checkered but that's a long shot. But every state has different laws. Ultimately the public is going to win this. The land owner killed his own chances of maintaining control. Most places I've been have access and easement laws and now that this is being highlighted, they'll be coming west in time. I am a firm believer in keeping off private if you don't have permission and the land owner should have right to do with their property as they want. But the public is the land owner in half this mess so they should get to access what's theirs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FlGunner, post: 2828690, member: 94240"] Well if it’s public land, it needs public access. Period. Land bought in a checkerboard type of sense should not be allowed to lock out access to the public. It was obviously well thought out way back whenever to buy land that way to control it. Best win for everyone would be if the land owner and Fed’s could work a deal to swap portions to make the land continuous and not checkered but that’s a long shot. But every state has different laws. Ultimately the public is going to win this. The land owner killed his own chances of maintaining control. Most places I’ve been have access and easement laws and now that this is being highlighted, they’ll be coming west in time. I am a firm believer in keeping off private if you don’t have permission and the land owner should have right to do with their property as they want. But the public is the land owner in half this mess so they should get to access what’s theirs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Corner crossing case
Top