Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Copper vs lead
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trubkir17" data-source="post: 2021013" data-attributes="member: 112555"><p>I agree that velocity and rpm are directly correlated. I just don't think for stability it is that critical.</p><p>My rifle barrel has 1:9.5" twist. On Hammer bullets page the 140 Absolute Hammer states a minimum of 1:9.25" and the 172 Absolute Hammer states a minimum twist of 1:8". There is no place on their page where they state a minimum velocity. Now I am not going to use either of these bullets because the math just doesn't work. Everytime I have fought math, math has won.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trubkir17, post: 2021013, member: 112555"] I agree that velocity and rpm are directly correlated. I just don't think for stability it is that critical. My rifle barrel has 1:9.5" twist. On Hammer bullets page the 140 Absolute Hammer states a minimum of 1:9.25" and the 172 Absolute Hammer states a minimum twist of 1:8". There is no place on their page where they state a minimum velocity. Now I am not going to use either of these bullets because the math just doesn't work. Everytime I have fought math, math has won. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Copper vs lead
Top