Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Comparing the Berger 210 VLD to the 215 Hybrid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AZShooter" data-source="post: 1228206" data-attributes="member: 5219"><p>I would suggest that any OAL short of the ogive falling into the case mouth would work. </p><p></p><p>I have loaded the 230s in three 300 RUMs and a 300 WSM. (The 300 WSM was seated very deeply to fit a 2.8" mag box) Regardless of the constraints of the mag box all rifles shot well.</p><p></p><p> Berger says the hybrid is not seating depth sensitive and I must agree. Their statement is true for the other calibers I have loaded with hybrids. 6mm, 7mm and 338. </p><p></p><p>I'd say give the 230s a try.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AZShooter, post: 1228206, member: 5219"] I would suggest that any OAL short of the ogive falling into the case mouth would work. I have loaded the 230s in three 300 RUMs and a 300 WSM. (The 300 WSM was seated very deeply to fit a 2.8" mag box) Regardless of the constraints of the mag box all rifles shot well. Berger says the hybrid is not seating depth sensitive and I must agree. Their statement is true for the other calibers I have loaded with hybrids. 6mm, 7mm and 338. I'd say give the 230s a try. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Comparing the Berger 210 VLD to the 215 Hybrid
Top