Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Come on out - It's safe now
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 78251" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p><strong>Re: Come on out - It\'s safe now</strong></p><p></p><p>I don't think there is much merit to someone else's observed drops by itself. Condition's or comparisons are really needed.</p><p>If somebody reports that a bullet requires less drop compensation than another, under same conditions, it means to me that the bullet has higher BC. Thats all.</p><p></p><p>If someone calculates a local/apparent BC of .XXX, but can't provide further -qualifying information, then I can't find a real use for it. There is just no way to back convert apparent BC from Montana into a sea level standard BC for comparison with other bullets without knowing the conditions producing the data.</p><p></p><p>It's all good to hear though. And queries for further info should not automatically be taken as an attack. Atleast, not from me. Questions=Interest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 78251, member: 1521"] [b]Re: Come on out - It\'s safe now[/b] I don't think there is much merit to someone else's observed drops by itself. Condition's or comparisons are really needed. If somebody reports that a bullet requires less drop compensation than another, under same conditions, it means to me that the bullet has higher BC. Thats all. If someone calculates a local/apparent BC of .XXX, but can't provide further -qualifying information, then I can't find a real use for it. There is just no way to back convert apparent BC from Montana into a sea level standard BC for comparison with other bullets without knowing the conditions producing the data. It's all good to hear though. And queries for further info should not automatically be taken as an attack. Atleast, not from me. Questions=Interest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Come on out - It's safe now
Top