Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Come on bullet makers!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="load" data-source="post: 466906" data-attributes="member: 22789"><p>I saw that earlier and its a good start. I like the expected 6.7 bc however its a copy of their 208 match bthp which is pushing lower bc's than than the 208 amax series.</p><p>If they build one off their 208 amax it should show close to .7! </p><p>i am excited to test out these new bullets when they do hit the market!</p><p>when i ran theretical numbers based off of current 225 volocities the comparable volocities and bcs put the 225 and 208 nearly identical @1760 however if you take the difference from the 208 bthpm @ .62 (expected)and its brother at .67 (expected)you have .05 then add that to the .648 (advertised) of the 208 amax you'd .698 wich would give a good edge to that weight selection! the velocity/bc of this combo would also out perform the monster 240smk</p><p>weres berger on this one?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="load, post: 466906, member: 22789"] I saw that earlier and its a good start. I like the expected 6.7 bc however its a copy of their 208 match bthp which is pushing lower bc's than than the 208 amax series. If they build one off their 208 amax it should show close to .7! i am excited to test out these new bullets when they do hit the market! when i ran theretical numbers based off of current 225 volocities the comparable volocities and bcs put the 225 and 208 nearly identical @1760 however if you take the difference from the 208 bthpm @ .62 (expected)and its brother at .67 (expected)you have .05 then add that to the .648 (advertised) of the 208 amax you'd .698 wich would give a good edge to that weight selection! the velocity/bc of this combo would also out perform the monster 240smk weres berger on this one? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Come on bullet makers!!!
Top