Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Christensen Carbon Barrels on Custom Rifles. Accuracy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LambornLR" data-source="post: 1499194" data-attributes="member: 105995"><p>I wouldn't go as far as saying there is "ZERO valuable data" from developing a load this way. Most of the time it works well for me. I do appreciate your feedback. I would also agree that testing ladders at longer ranges--500 yards plus--is a better way to go, but due to time and range availability, sometimes you just have to work with what you got. </p><p></p><p>My overarching point is this: when I'm testing the rifles I have built, my goal is to see if they will <em>easily </em>shoot sub 0.5 MOA<em>. </em>I'm not trying to develop the perfect load for them. I'll let the owner do that. The reason I went down the rabbit hole with the CA barrels is because I couldn't get them to shoot. I expected much better performance for a $600 barrel, and I was just curious if other folks with CA barrels were getting good performance. I have heard a lot of varying opinions about them, and I wanted to see what people on this forum had to say.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LambornLR, post: 1499194, member: 105995"] I wouldn't go as far as saying there is "ZERO valuable data" from developing a load this way. Most of the time it works well for me. I do appreciate your feedback. I would also agree that testing ladders at longer ranges--500 yards plus--is a better way to go, but due to time and range availability, sometimes you just have to work with what you got. My overarching point is this: when I'm testing the rifles I have built, my goal is to see if they will [I]easily [/I]shoot sub 0.5 MOA[I]. [/I]I'm not trying to develop the perfect load for them. I'll let the owner do that. The reason I went down the rabbit hole with the CA barrels is because I couldn't get them to shoot. I expected much better performance for a $600 barrel, and I was just curious if other folks with CA barrels were getting good performance. I have heard a lot of varying opinions about them, and I wanted to see what people on this forum had to say. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Christensen Carbon Barrels on Custom Rifles. Accuracy?
Top