Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Charge weight vs volume, in filled cases - mind blowing discovery?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Max Heat" data-source="post: 922448" data-attributes="member: 43153"><p>I agree that the case-to-case variations in internal volume probably ARE very mynoot. And it really doesn't seem to make sense that eyed-up powder "level" readings could possibly be accurate enough to compensate for those variations. The unexpectedly tight chrono numbers did get my attention though. But it's possible that maybe I did jump the gun, in drawing conclusions from too little data, which I can't even locate now to post up. Without even having those actual #'s to back up what I am saying, it doesn't put me on very solid ground.</p><p></p><p>So it looks like time to stop saying, and start doing. The best thing to do would probably be to exactly replicate what I did, and see if the #'s come up similarly. But being that I'm more into shooting the RUM now, I'll see if THAT gets the results that I'm claiming. Only failing that, will I fall back on an exact replication scenario, using RM rounds. With how deep the snow has been getting around here lately, it will probably take at least a few days to a week (possibly even longer) until I can get back here and post some #s. But I WILL definitely do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Max Heat, post: 922448, member: 43153"] I agree that the case-to-case variations in internal volume probably ARE very mynoot. And it really doesn't seem to make sense that eyed-up powder "level" readings could possibly be accurate enough to compensate for those variations. The unexpectedly tight chrono numbers did get my attention though. But it's possible that maybe I did jump the gun, in drawing conclusions from too little data, which I can't even locate now to post up. Without even having those actual #'s to back up what I am saying, it doesn't put me on very solid ground. So it looks like time to stop saying, and start doing. The best thing to do would probably be to exactly replicate what I did, and see if the #'s come up similarly. But being that I'm more into shooting the RUM now, I'll see if THAT gets the results that I'm claiming. Only failing that, will I fall back on an exact replication scenario, using RM rounds. With how deep the snow has been getting around here lately, it will probably take at least a few days to a week (possibly even longer) until I can get back here and post some #s. But I WILL definitely do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Charge weight vs volume, in filled cases - mind blowing discovery?
Top