Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Chamber pressures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 750019" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>I'm not gonna build a pyramid to qualify my points. I was simply focused on seating with all else allowing this single comparison. That is in a sense, shallow seating due to one barrel chambered with a long throat -vs- deeper seating with another barrel chambered to a shallower throat. Same cartridge, powder amount, bullet, bullet coatings, counter adjusted to same neck tension, same throat clearances, leade angles, trim clearance, neck clearance, etc.</p><p>Maybe this departed from the actual context of the question. Or maybe it should have been further qualified.</p><p></p><p>With seating adjustments off the lands there truly is a mountain of combining factors that could lead to MV wiggling a bit up or down -without every qualifier taken into account.</p><p>And I agree that longer freebores change the ballgame, but that wasn't in question right?</p><p></p><p></p><p>You mean bullet SEATING has little affect on MVs until touching rifling right?</p><p>If neck tension was normalized in comparison, this could be true.</p><p>If your suggesting that the bullet MASS doesn't matter until hitting rifling -because it's relatively low, this is totally wrong.</p><p></p><p>I have no agenda here to scare anyone from deep seating. To me this seems only significant to consider when nearing a donut.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 750019, member: 1521"] I'm not gonna build a pyramid to qualify my points. I was simply focused on seating with all else allowing this single comparison. That is in a sense, shallow seating due to one barrel chambered with a long throat -vs- deeper seating with another barrel chambered to a shallower throat. Same cartridge, powder amount, bullet, bullet coatings, counter adjusted to same neck tension, same throat clearances, leade angles, trim clearance, neck clearance, etc. Maybe this departed from the actual context of the question. Or maybe it should have been further qualified. With seating adjustments off the lands there truly is a mountain of combining factors that could lead to MV wiggling a bit up or down -without every qualifier taken into account. And I agree that longer freebores change the ballgame, but that wasn't in question right? You mean bullet SEATING has little affect on MVs until touching rifling right? If neck tension was normalized in comparison, this could be true. If your suggesting that the bullet MASS doesn't matter until hitting rifling -because it's relatively low, this is totally wrong. I have no agenda here to scare anyone from deep seating. To me this seems only significant to consider when nearing a donut. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Chamber pressures
Top