Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Chamber pressure changes with altitude
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BallisticsGuy" data-source="post: 1221320" data-attributes="member: 96226"><p>I guess it's time for me to go back up the hill with a chronograph and a Kestrel. I don't have gobs of time either but I'm happy enough to go out and have a good time shooting and gather some data. </p><p></p><p>One of you doesn't seem to want to arrive at an answer, happy to assume someone else had that on their list of things to do in the last century but provides no study abstract to support the assertion. The other already has their answer but its derivation from a tiny sample doesn't lend it to being applied generally so the former calls it an anecdote instead of what it is which is empirical experimentally derived evidence deserving of further investigation. It's deserving of investigation simply because the result was not null. The fact that data may not have been perfectly scientifically gathered only promotes the case for further testing so that the result can be verified or refuted. </p><p></p><p>A final thought, accusations of logical fallacy use are like accusations of misspellings and poor grammar. They're almost always accompanied by, if not surrounded by, the very thing they decry. This thread was no different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BallisticsGuy, post: 1221320, member: 96226"] I guess it's time for me to go back up the hill with a chronograph and a Kestrel. I don't have gobs of time either but I'm happy enough to go out and have a good time shooting and gather some data. One of you doesn't seem to want to arrive at an answer, happy to assume someone else had that on their list of things to do in the last century but provides no study abstract to support the assertion. The other already has their answer but its derivation from a tiny sample doesn't lend it to being applied generally so the former calls it an anecdote instead of what it is which is empirical experimentally derived evidence deserving of further investigation. It's deserving of investigation simply because the result was not null. The fact that data may not have been perfectly scientifically gathered only promotes the case for further testing so that the result can be verified or refuted. A final thought, accusations of logical fallacy use are like accusations of misspellings and poor grammar. They're almost always accompanied by, if not surrounded by, the very thing they decry. This thread was no different. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Chamber pressure changes with altitude
Top