Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Burris or Nikon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Poodleshooter1" data-source="post: 446307" data-attributes="member: 28394"><p>-Standard Fullfield IIs (not the TAC series) offer finger adjustable turrets; Prostaffs require coin adjustment. Advantage Burris.</p><p>-Glass is probably about even between the two, with possibly a slight advantage to Burris.</p><p>-Nikon has the BDC reticle, Burris has the Ballistic Plex. Advantage Burris IMHO</p><p>-Burris is typically slightly more expensive than ProStaff for identical features. Advantage Nikon.</p><p></p><p>The Nikon Buckmaster line is probably a better comparison to the Fullfield IIs, based on price for regular 3-9x 40mm scopes. They have target styled turrets in addition to better glass that is fully the equal of the Fullfield IIs.</p><p>In short, I'd prefer Fullfield II over ProStaffs, but would prefer Nikon Buckmasters to either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Poodleshooter1, post: 446307, member: 28394"] -Standard Fullfield IIs (not the TAC series) offer finger adjustable turrets; Prostaffs require coin adjustment. Advantage Burris. -Glass is probably about even between the two, with possibly a slight advantage to Burris. -Nikon has the BDC reticle, Burris has the Ballistic Plex. Advantage Burris IMHO -Burris is typically slightly more expensive than ProStaff for identical features. Advantage Nikon. The Nikon Buckmaster line is probably a better comparison to the Fullfield IIs, based on price for regular 3-9x 40mm scopes. They have target styled turrets in addition to better glass that is fully the equal of the Fullfield IIs. In short, I'd prefer Fullfield II over ProStaffs, but would prefer Nikon Buckmasters to either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Burris or Nikon?
Top