Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1608074" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>Don't you just love how the ATF has now reworded the interpretation of the bumpstock ban to where anything can be considered a "machine-gun" even if the trigger is getting pulled for each shot, that if your finger doesn't move to pull the trigger, then it's not tehnically "puling the trigger"... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> So basically, now they're saying they can legally regulate finger movements as to whether or not your semi-auto is a semi-auto or a machine-gun? That's some dangerously slippery crap!!! That's what we were worried about from the beginning, not the stupid bumpstocks themselves...Like so many idiotic Fudds thought it was about. Now Trump has set us all up for a total semi-auto ban and door-kicking confiscation at the barrel of the government's machine-guns or else we'll get shot and killed by jackbooted thugs because they're obeying unlawful and treasonous orders from the Top.</p><p></p><p>And now the Supreme Court has refused to hear the lawsuit against the bumpstock ban... I wonder how much money the SC got payed by Soros and the Dems to avoid taking on that slam-dunk of a case to prove how unconstitutional Trump's law is. They KNEW it would be reversed if it ever made it to the bench, but they refused to hear it because they knew it would win. Sad day for the 2A. I bet the Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves seeing what a bunch of p*ssies our country has become.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1608074, member: 12995"] Don't you just love how the ATF has now reworded the interpretation of the bumpstock ban to where anything can be considered a "machine-gun" even if the trigger is getting pulled for each shot, that if your finger doesn't move to pull the trigger, then it's not tehnically "puling the trigger"... :rolleyes: So basically, now they're saying they can legally regulate finger movements as to whether or not your semi-auto is a semi-auto or a machine-gun? That's some dangerously slippery crap!!! That's what we were worried about from the beginning, not the stupid bumpstocks themselves...Like so many idiotic Fudds thought it was about. Now Trump has set us all up for a total semi-auto ban and door-kicking confiscation at the barrel of the government's machine-guns or else we'll get shot and killed by jackbooted thugs because they're obeying unlawful and treasonous orders from the Top. And now the Supreme Court has refused to hear the lawsuit against the bumpstock ban... I wonder how much money the SC got payed by Soros and the Dems to avoid taking on that slam-dunk of a case to prove how unconstitutional Trump's law is. They KNEW it would be reversed if it ever made it to the bench, but they refused to hear it because they knew it would win. Sad day for the 2A. I bet the Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves seeing what a bunch of p*ssies our country has become. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
Top