Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 107796" data-source="post: 1544427"><p>My $.02 and a good segway to defuse the current conversation.</p><p></p><p>The OP has specified legislation due to bumpstocks. I've concluded for myself that most restrictions, excepting those which we seem to agree upon, like automatic weapons or nuclear devices, make zero sense. That being said, what is clearly amiss, is the responsibility to make sure that we speak up clearly and directly, when we know an Adam Lonza, that is mentally ill, does not communicate with his parents, blacks out his windows, etc. and still has free access to guns. No law needed. When we know a friend is going thru tough times with his or her spouse or friend, and we do not tell him to maybe lock up the guns thru this time, we fail in that same responsibility. The 2nd amendment is part of a civil structure. If we view our gun rights as purely and absolutely individual, without a sense of civil responsibility, we fail. No law needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 107796, post: 1544427"] My $.02 and a good segway to defuse the current conversation. The OP has specified legislation due to bumpstocks. I've concluded for myself that most restrictions, excepting those which we seem to agree upon, like automatic weapons or nuclear devices, make zero sense. That being said, what is clearly amiss, is the responsibility to make sure that we speak up clearly and directly, when we know an Adam Lonza, that is mentally ill, does not communicate with his parents, blacks out his windows, etc. and still has free access to guns. No law needed. When we know a friend is going thru tough times with his or her spouse or friend, and we do not tell him to maybe lock up the guns thru this time, we fail in that same responsibility. The 2nd amendment is part of a civil structure. If we view our gun rights as purely and absolutely individual, without a sense of civil responsibility, we fail. No law needed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
Top