Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet Trap
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rscott5028" data-source="post: 659949" data-attributes="member: 24624"><p>I don't think they're liars. </p><p> </p><p>So, I would stipulate that Barnes' tests are as good as any artificial test I could do to estimate that 1600 fps is roughly adequate for expansion of the LRX. </p><p> </p><p>The only way to improve on that information is to go shoot a bunch of game animals with impact velocities in that range. </p><p> </p><p>You could do an internet popularity poll. But, that's pretty lame information. </p><p> </p><p>-- richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rscott5028, post: 659949, member: 24624"] I don't think they're liars. So, I would stipulate that Barnes' tests are as good as any artificial test I could do to estimate that 1600 fps is roughly adequate for expansion of the LRX. The only way to improve on that information is to go shoot a bunch of game animals with impact velocities in that range. You could do an internet popularity poll. But, that's pretty lame information. -- richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet Trap
Top