Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet RPM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RustyRick" data-source="post: 1049981" data-attributes="member: 69572"><p>I see arm chair quarterbacks (ballisticians) on YouTube and forms with 2 radically different statements of bullet RPM. One prolific expert (define an expert - - a has been,like x-wife, spert - drip under pressure) stating bullet RPM as high as</p><p> </p><p>200+ thousand,and another at 20+ thousand. So whose right?</p><p> </p><p>There must be a simple math formula that takes a 10-1 ratio at 3000 ft. per sec that tells you the RPM. </p><p> </p><p>I doubt either number is correct. At 200+ thousand I doubt the bullet would stay together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RustyRick, post: 1049981, member: 69572"] I see arm chair quarterbacks (ballisticians) on YouTube and forms with 2 radically different statements of bullet RPM. One prolific expert (define an expert - - a has been,like x-wife, spert - drip under pressure) stating bullet RPM as high as 200+ thousand,and another at 20+ thousand. So whose right? There must be a simple math formula that takes a 10-1 ratio at 3000 ft. per sec that tells you the RPM. I doubt either number is correct. At 200+ thousand I doubt the bullet would stay together. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet RPM
Top