Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet Penetration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jerry D" data-source="post: 1863764" data-attributes="member: 14452"><p>With all the 6.5mm bullet hype, assuming the bullet is the same design, traveling the same speed, with similar SD, can we assume penetration will be similar With different calibers</p><p></p><p>140 6.5 accubond vs 180gr .308</p><p></p><p>130gr tsx in 6.5 vs 165gr .3089</p><p></p><p>Other than a larger wound channel, can the 6.5 get the job done.</p><p></p><p>I see guys using 6.5prc to 1000 yards, it's 300 fps faster than the cm. At the same impact velocities the 6.5cm can still really reach out there.</p><p></p><p>For bears and big animals, if the smaller bullet penetrates as deeply, is the larger wound channel going to kill faster assuming similiar shot placement.</p><p></p><p>How about a 6.5 140 gr accubond at 2750 fps vs .338 200gr accubond at 2650 fps</p><p></p><p>I am really interested to hear if a 6.5cm with a Barnes tsx or a 130 lrx can penetrate with the bigger guns or go deeper. </p><p></p><p>130gr 6.5 tsx vs .308 180gr parition or accubond at the same speed as each other?</p><p></p><p>Thanks for opinions, assuming same speed please rank the bullets as far as penetration goes.</p><p></p><p>Thanks again</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jerry D, post: 1863764, member: 14452"] With all the 6.5mm bullet hype, assuming the bullet is the same design, traveling the same speed, with similar SD, can we assume penetration will be similar With different calibers 140 6.5 accubond vs 180gr .308 130gr tsx in 6.5 vs 165gr .3089 Other than a larger wound channel, can the 6.5 get the job done. I see guys using 6.5prc to 1000 yards, it's 300 fps faster than the cm. At the same impact velocities the 6.5cm can still really reach out there. For bears and big animals, if the smaller bullet penetrates as deeply, is the larger wound channel going to kill faster assuming similiar shot placement. How about a 6.5 140 gr accubond at 2750 fps vs .338 200gr accubond at 2650 fps I am really interested to hear if a 6.5cm with a Barnes tsx or a 130 lrx can penetrate with the bigger guns or go deeper. 130gr 6.5 tsx vs .308 180gr parition or accubond at the same speed as each other? Thanks for opinions, assuming same speed please rank the bullets as far as penetration goes. Thanks again [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet Penetration
Top