Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Brainstorming an Ultra-handy large caliber Long ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yorke-1" data-source="post: 1483553" data-attributes="member: 11960"><p>It wouldn't be too off topic to share your results here. I'd love to hear what you experienced when shooting the same loads in both short and long barrels in each chambering and the differences you saw when switching to a faster burning powder under the same conditions. If we can get enough data then maybe we can all start to come to a consensus. Maybe I'll dig through my log books and pull all the data I have from years firing the same loads in rifle length (24-30") and specialty pistol length (14-20") barrels. That's not including 20+ rifle chamberings I've worked with in short (under 18") barrels that I didn't have longer barrels to test the same loads in.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing in physics is actually simple and over simplifying it usually means something gets overlooked. My focus back in college was kinematics so internal ballistics is a little out of my bubble. I will confidently say though that while you can't "beat" physics, you can manipulate it pretty easily.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yorke-1, post: 1483553, member: 11960"] It wouldn't be too off topic to share your results here. I'd love to hear what you experienced when shooting the same loads in both short and long barrels in each chambering and the differences you saw when switching to a faster burning powder under the same conditions. If we can get enough data then maybe we can all start to come to a consensus. Maybe I'll dig through my log books and pull all the data I have from years firing the same loads in rifle length (24-30") and specialty pistol length (14-20") barrels. That's not including 20+ rifle chamberings I've worked with in short (under 18") barrels that I didn't have longer barrels to test the same loads in. Nothing in physics is actually simple and over simplifying it usually means something gets overlooked. My focus back in college was kinematics so internal ballistics is a little out of my bubble. I will confidently say though that while you can't "beat" physics, you can manipulate it pretty easily. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Brainstorming an Ultra-handy large caliber Long ranger
Top