Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
BR vs ST. VS M
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 3027583" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>Just sayin: until we can measure primer attributes ourselves, there is no reason to believe anything from anyone.</p><p></p><p>The reason I hold this notion is because primer makers have utterly failed to provide the following information:</p><p>1. optimum striking</p><p>2. optimum seating</p><p>3. optimum flash hole</p><p>4. model per capacity</p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure primer makers do not know these things. That they know only as much as we do.</p><p>And so, it's on us to find out (if ever).</p><p>Otherwise, it's hearsay, anecdotal, clan lore, sales brochures, and abstract nonsense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 3027583, member: 1521"] Just sayin: until we can measure primer attributes ourselves, there is no reason to believe anything from anyone. The reason I hold this notion is because primer makers have utterly failed to provide the following information: 1. optimum striking 2. optimum seating 3. optimum flash hole 4. model per capacity I'm pretty sure primer makers do not know these things. That they know only as much as we do. And so, it's on us to find out (if ever). Otherwise, it's hearsay, anecdotal, clan lore, sales brochures, and abstract nonsense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
BR vs ST. VS M
Top