Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bought a .270 Today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jfloyd" data-source="post: 2010313" data-attributes="member: 73643"><p>I'm curious how they are getting 3000 when the data they publish maxes at 2830 with the 140's. Meanwhile, their 270 data with 140 pill hits 3000 with three different powders. Have you chronod their 260 ammo? Not very dusty from my perspective. Seems Ragged Edge is in the right ballpark based on Nosler's published data.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jfloyd, post: 2010313, member: 73643"] I’m curious how they are getting 3000 when the data they publish maxes at 2830 with the 140’s. Meanwhile, their 270 data with 140 pill hits 3000 with three different powders. Have you chronod their 260 ammo? Not very dusty from my perspective. Seems Ragged Edge is in the right ballpark based on Nosler’s published data. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bought a .270 Today
Top